Open source journals of library and information science: a bibliometric study

Author:

Kumar Satpathy Sunil,K. Maharana Rabindra,Kumar Das Ashok

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to investigate the scholarly communications in open access journals of library & information science and to study the key dimensions of these publications. Design/methodology/approach – For the analysis of the study, top ten open access journals of 2011, which were indexed in SCOPUS, have been selected. The authors employed necessary bibliometric measures to analyze different publication parameters. Findings – It is found that the contribution of articles in these top ten open access journals in 2011 is good, i.e. 37.3 percent. Single authored papers are found to be the highest (40.48 percent), followed by two-authored and then three-authored papers. The degree of collaboration is found to be between 0.33 and 0.8. The numbers of citations used in the paper are also good (average 21.48 percent paper). In regards to ranking of country productivity, the USA topped the list. Research limitations/implications – This paper focuses on the publication traits of top ten open access journals of library & information science of the year 2011. A total of 373 papers from these ten journals are analyzed. Further studies can include more open access journals of this field for a period of more than one year. Practical implications – Scholars can benefit from insights into the scholarly contributions of top ten open access journals of 2011 in the field of library & information science. Originality/value – This paper provides valuable insights into the nature of academic publishing of open access journals of library & information science. It can help the researchers, professionals, teachers and students to understand the top open access journals, valuable contributions, highly cited journals, country productivity, and other parameters.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference8 articles.

1. Anwar, M.A. and Saeed, H. (1999), “Pakistani librarians as authors: a bibliometric study of citations in LISA-PLUS”, International Islamic University Malaysia, and Hamid Saeed Asian Libraries, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 39-46.

2. Cole, F.J. and Eales, N.B. (1917), “Statistical analysis of literature of history of comparative anatomy”, Science Progress, Vol. 11 No. 44, pp. 578-596.

3. Desai, C.M. (2003), “Getting cited: ten tips for practitioners of citation analysis in the library”, College and Research Libraries News, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 21-24.

4. Gian Singh, G. , Mittal, R. and Ahmed, M. (2007), “A bibliometric study of literature on digital libraries”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 342-348.

5. Hussain, A. and Fatima, N.A. (2011), “Bibliometric analysis of the Chinese :ibrarianship: An International Electronic Journal (2006-2010)”, Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, Vol. 31, available at: www.iclc.us/cliej/cl31HF.pdf (accessed 22 June 2011).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3