Understanding project success through analysis of project management approach

Author:

Rolstadås Asbjørn,Tommelein Iris,Morten Schiefloe Per,Ballard Glenn

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that project success is dependent on the project management approach selected, relative to the challenges posed by the project, and to develop an analytical model for analyzing the performance of the project organization. Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on literature review, model development, interviews, and case studies. Findings – The findings define two different approaches in project management: The prescriptive approach focusses on the formal qualities of the project organization, including governing documentation and procedures. The adaptive approach focusses on the process of developing and improving a project organization, project culture and team commitment. The two approaches have been identified through studies of three different case projects. An analytical model, referred to as the Pentagon model, has been applied for analyzing the performance of the project organization and explaining the project management approach. The model focusses on five different organizational aspects: structure, technologies, culture, social relations and networks, and interaction. Research limitations/implications – The research is limited to megaprojects and to project management success. Practical implications – It is suggested that project teams consider and select their project management approach at project initiation, and accordingly decide on relevant success factors to focus on. The adapted Pentagon model can be applied to develop the project management organization and assess its performance in the course of project delivery. Originality/value – The contribution of the research is the application of the analytical model, and the identification as well as illustration of the prescriptive, vs adaptive management approach.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference39 articles.

1. Andersen, E.S. (2005), Prosjektledelse – et organisasjonsperspektiv, NKI-forlaget, Oslo.

2. Ballard, G. , Tommelein, I. , Koskela, L. and Howell, G. (2002), “Lean construction tools and techniques”, in Best, R. and de Valence, G. (Eds), Design and Construction: Building in Value, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 227-255.

3. Belassi, W. and Tukel, O.I. (1996), “A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in project”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 141-151.

4. Bredillet, C. (2007), “Exploring research in project management: nine schools of project management research”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 2-4.

5. Chapman, C.B. and Ward, S.C. (2003), Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques and Insights, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3