Author:
Aapaoja Aki,Herrala Maila,Pekuri Aki,Haapasalo Harri
Abstract
PurposeDefective stakeholder management has frequently resulted in conflicts and partial failures. Integrated project delivery (IPD) and team integration provides opportunities for organizations to achieve more than they could on their own. The purpose of this study is to analyze the level and challenges of team integration. In addition, study tries to recognize the cornerstones for creating integrated teams in construction projects.Design/methodology/approachThis paper discusses the characteristics and level of team integration in a construction project, but the main purpose is to derive the cornerstones for creating integrated teams. Results are derived from the analysis of current literature and an empirical case study.FindingsThis paper describes the 12 characteristics of an integrated project team. In addition, the cornerstones for creating integrated teams were recognized as the early involvement and assessment of stakeholders, continuous communication and interaction, cultural change, and making the IPD process well known.Practical implicationsThe construction industry is aware of the need to improve control over its delivery processes. In addition, the customers are aware of waste and have started to demand more value. Because IPD and team integration supports the controlling over delivery processes and enables the more efficient value creation, these are extensive issues in developing construction industry.Originality/valueTeam integration is an important part of value creation. Limited research attention has been directed at what the level of integration is compared with the characteristics of integration. This paper also advances team integration research by identifying the cornerstones for integration.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference53 articles.
1. Aaltonen, K. and Kujala, J. (2010), “A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 26, pp. 381‐397.
2. AIA (2007), Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide, American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC, available at: www.ipd‐ca.net/images/IPDeliveryGuide_final_revised.pdf (accessed 12 June 2012).
3. Akintoye, A., McIntosh, G. and Fitzgerald, E. (2000), “An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 6 Nos 3/4, pp. 159‐168.
4. Anumba, C.J., Baugh, C. and Khalfan, M.M.A. (2002), “Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 102 No. 5, pp. 260‐270.
5. Ashcraft, H.W. (2010), Negotiating an Integrated Project Delivery Agreement, Hanson Bridgett LLP, San Francisco, CA.
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献