Enabling organizational learning from rescue operations

Author:

Pilemalm Sofie,Andersson Dennis,Yousefi Mojir Kayvan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the re-development process of the Swedish Rescue Services Incident Reporting System from an organizational learning perspective with the purpose to suggest what is needed to enable long-term learning from rescue operations. Design/methodology/approach – The study is carried out as a case study relying on interviews, participant observation and workshop methods. The study case is the Swedish Incident Reporting System. Findings – The objectives expressed by the central agency leading the studied process aimed at implementing double-loop learning objectives by revising the incident reports and to improve future operations accordingly. In practice this objective was lost along the way, with the agency focussing on cosmetic changes to the report such as terminology, attributes and labels. Meanwhile the local rescue services expressed different and concrete needs, requiring new system functionality, case/experience based learning, process improvements and organizational development. A number of suggestions of such measures are provided by the study, to be used by rescue services and other response organizations. Originality/value – The case stands out because the re-development process is driven by one stakeholder, with the ambition to include multiple stakeholders’ needs. The study should be of specific interest to fire rescue services world-wide. However, considering that many tasks, learning and evaluation aspects of rescue operations are similar regardless of type of first responder involved (e.g. in firefighting, traffic accidents, and cardiac arrests), the results are also of interest to emergency management in general.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Safety Research

Reference18 articles.

1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978), Reading Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action Approach, Addison Wesley, MA.

2. Bernard, R.H. (2000), Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

3. Biggs, J.B. (1987), Student Approaches to Learning and Studying, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne.

4. Cookea, L. and Rohleder, T. (2006), “Learning from incidents: from normal accidents to high reliability”, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 213-239.

5. Dekker, S. and Jonsén, M. (2007), Förutsättningar för systematisk utvärdering av räddningsinsatser (Pre-requisites for Systematic Evaluation of Rescue Operations), Räddningsverket, NCO, p. 12.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3