Communication during mass casualty decontamination: highlighting the gaps
Author:
Carter Holly,Drury John,Rubin G. James,Williams Richard,Amlôt Richard
Abstract
PurposeEffective communication has been recognised as an important issue for the management of incidents involving decontamination; evidence shows that failure to communicate effectively may result in increased public anxiety and non‐compliance. This paper aims to examine current provision for communicating with members of the public during decontamination, to facilitate the development of improved responder communication strategies.Design/methodology/approachTo examine the current provision for communicating with members of the public, the authors reviewed open source decontamination guidance documents for responders, as well as published reports of emergency preparedness exercises involving decontamination.FindingsThe review of decontamination guidance documents showed that specific guidance for professional responders on how to communicate with the public during incidents that involve decontamination could be improved. Similarly, the review of published decontamination exercises shows that a stronger emphasis on communication with members of the public is needed, in addition to the use of exercises to evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies.Originality/valueThe present research summarises existing evidence relating to how communication strategies employed by responders can shape public responses to decontamination. Analysed alongside current decontamination guidance for emergency responders, this evidence highlights potential gaps in planning for communicating with members of the public during decontamination. It is hoped that this will promote an increased understanding of the importance of communication during these types of incidents, which will in turn facilitate the development of more comprehensive responder communication strategies.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Safety Research
Reference73 articles.
1. Abeel, B. (2006), Multi‐Casualty Mass Decontamination Guidance Document for First Responders, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, Mather, CA. 2. Al‐Damouk, M. and Bleetman, A. (2005), “Impact of the department of health initiative to equip and train acute trusts to manage chemically contaminated casualties”, Emergency Medicine Journal, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 347‐350. 3. Alexander, D.A. and Klein, S. (2006), “The challenge of preparation for a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear terrorist attack”, Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 126‐131. 4. Amlôt, R., Larner, J., Matar, H., Jones, D.R., Carter, H., Turner, E.A., Price, S.C. and Chilcott, R.P. (2010), “Comparative analysis of showering protocols for mass‐casualty decontamination”, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 435‐439. 5. Amos, J., Redman, T., Few, G., Findlay, D. and Dyer, J. (2010), Major Incident Plan, South Central Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Oxfordshire.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|