Communication during mass casualty decontamination: highlighting the gaps

Author:

Carter Holly,Drury John,Rubin G. James,Williams Richard,Amlôt Richard

Abstract

PurposeEffective communication has been recognised as an important issue for the management of incidents involving decontamination; evidence shows that failure to communicate effectively may result in increased public anxiety and non‐compliance. This paper aims to examine current provision for communicating with members of the public during decontamination, to facilitate the development of improved responder communication strategies.Design/methodology/approachTo examine the current provision for communicating with members of the public, the authors reviewed open source decontamination guidance documents for responders, as well as published reports of emergency preparedness exercises involving decontamination.FindingsThe review of decontamination guidance documents showed that specific guidance for professional responders on how to communicate with the public during incidents that involve decontamination could be improved. Similarly, the review of published decontamination exercises shows that a stronger emphasis on communication with members of the public is needed, in addition to the use of exercises to evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies.Originality/valueThe present research summarises existing evidence relating to how communication strategies employed by responders can shape public responses to decontamination. Analysed alongside current decontamination guidance for emergency responders, this evidence highlights potential gaps in planning for communicating with members of the public during decontamination. It is hoped that this will promote an increased understanding of the importance of communication during these types of incidents, which will in turn facilitate the development of more comprehensive responder communication strategies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Safety Research

Reference73 articles.

1. Abeel, B. (2006), Multi‐Casualty Mass Decontamination Guidance Document for First Responders, Governor's Office of Emergency Services, Mather, CA.

2. Al‐Damouk, M. and Bleetman, A. (2005), “Impact of the department of health initiative to equip and train acute trusts to manage chemically contaminated casualties”, Emergency Medicine Journal, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 347‐350.

3. Alexander, D.A. and Klein, S. (2006), “The challenge of preparation for a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear terrorist attack”, Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 126‐131.

4. Amlôt, R., Larner, J., Matar, H., Jones, D.R., Carter, H., Turner, E.A., Price, S.C. and Chilcott, R.P. (2010), “Comparative analysis of showering protocols for mass‐casualty decontamination”, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 435‐439.

5. Amos, J., Redman, T., Few, G., Findlay, D. and Dyer, J. (2010), Major Incident Plan, South Central Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Oxfordshire.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3