Author:
King Julian,Dow Johnny,Stevenson Brendan
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the clinical outcome data collected as part of an 18-week, abstinence-based residential therapeutic community (TC) programme, Higher Ground Drug Rehabilitation Trust (Higher Ground) in New Zealand. Lessons and implications for routine collection of clinical outcome data are identified.
Design/methodology/approach
Higher Ground collects longitudinal data on all consenting clients using a battery of validated psychometric tools, with repeated measures at up to nine points in time from first presentation through to 12-month post-discharge follow up. Data analysis covered clients who entered Higher Ground between 1 July 2012 and 2 June 2015 (n=524).
Findings
Clients presented with histories of addiction which often had significant negative associations with their physical and psychological health, their relationships, work, accommodation and criminal behaviour. By the time they exited the programme, clinically and statistically significant improvements were seen across multiple indicators including: substance use and abstinence; symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and stress; and a range of social indicators.
Research limitations/implications
Attrition in follow-up research is a significant challenge, with people completing the TC programme being more likely to participate than those who do not. This limits generalizability in post-discharge data. There was no control group, making causal attribution a challenge. Identifying suitable benchmarks from the literature is challenging because of the variety of outcome measures and research methodologies used.
Practical implications
Tracking client outcomes longitudinally using psychometric tools is potentially valuable for TCs and their funding bodies, as it provides insights into patterns of client recovery that can inform ongoing service improvements and resource allocation decisions. However, significant challenges remain.
Originality/value
The study demonstrates the value, and practical challenges, of collecting high-quality outcome data in a TC setting.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Phychiatric Mental Health
Reference55 articles.
1. What works in substance abuse treatment programmes for offenders?;The Prison Journal,2012
2. Therapeutic communities vs methadone-maintenance – prospective controlled study of narcotic addiction treatment – design and one year follow-up;Archives of General Psychiatry,1980
3. Mediators of drug treatment outcomes;Addictive Behaviors,1996
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献