Author:
Ho David Kim Hin,Hui Eddie C.M.,Ho Tai Wing,Rengarajan Satyanarain
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the behavior of “rational” residential developers, under game theory, for their pricing strategy in a competitive environment.
Design/methodology/approach
Results show that residential developers cooperate implicitly for long-term benefit, leading to a slow-down in sales. Developers are motivated to deviate from cooperating at the beginning and at the end of successive periods in a sub-market. Relatively high profits, earnable in the first few periods, provide an allowance to undercut prices and improve sales. For the last few periods, the punishment for any deviation from cooperating is insignificant or zero. Note that the first-mover advantage in a new market is evident. On the effect of uncertainty on the developer’s residential prices, results show that as uncertainty increases, prices decrease while price variability increases.
Research limitations/implications
This study highlights the merits of a uniquely simplified experimental research design for the strategic behavioral pricing of the private residential development market using a game theoretic approach.
Practical implications
This study enhances the understanding of the residential development strategy of developers in the residential development market.
Originality/value
There is limited research on pricing strategy for the private residential development market in Asia.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference37 articles.
1. Second-mover advantage and price leadership in Bertrand Duopoly;Journal of Economic Literature,2002
2. An empirical study of time on market using multidimensional segmentation of housing markets;Real Estate Economics,1976
3. The external validity of experimental economics techniques: analysis of demand behaviour;Economic Inquiry,1987
4. Duopoly: value where sellers are few;Quarterly Journal of Ecnomics,1929
5. Duopoly pricing under risk aversion and parameter uncertainty;Journal of Product and Brand Management,2004