Poverty by social, religious and economic groups in India and its largest states

Author:

Panagariya Arvind,More Vishal

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to ground in serious empirical evidence the debate on whether the post-reform acceleration in growth has helped bring poverty down for all economic, social and religious groups and in all state or has left certain groups or states. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses unit-level data from the so-called thick rounds of expenditure surveys by National Sample Survey (NSS) in the years 1993-1994, 2004-2005, 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 and estimates the proportion of the population below the official Tendulkar line. Adequate care is taken to address the issue of sample size in reporting the estimates. Findings – Whether we slice the data by social, religious or economic groups, by states or by rural and urban areas, poverty has significantly declined between 1993-1994 and 2011-2012 with a substantial acceleration during the faster-growth period from 2004-2005 to 2011-2012. Poverty rates among the disadvantaged social groups and minorities have declined faster so that the gap in poverty rates between them and the general population has declined. In 7 of the 16 states with large Muslim populations, the poverty rate for them is now below that for the Hindus. Research limitations/implications – Use of survey data has its limitations, especially when the sample sizes are small. The paper also does not assess the direct contribution of growth in relation to that through redistribution. Practical implications – The paper presents implications for identification of the poor for the purpose of designing targeted interventions. Originality/value – This is the first paper to offer up-to-date estimates of poverty by social, religious and economic groups, by states and by rural and urban areas.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development,Business and International Management

Reference10 articles.

1. Dubey, A. and Gangopadhyay, S. (1998), Counting the Poor: Where Are the Poor in India? Sarvekshana, Analytical Report No. 1, Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation, National Sample Survey Organization, New Delhi.

2. Meenakshi, J.V. , Ray, R. and Gupta, S. (2000), “Estimates of poverty for SC, ST and Female-Headed Households”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 35 No. 31, pp. 2748-2754.

3. Mukim, M. and Panagariya, A. (2012), “Growth, openness and the socially disadvantaged”, in Bhagwati, , J. , Panagariya, and A. (Eds), India’s Reform: How they Produced inclusive Growth, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 186-246.

4. Panagariya, A. (2008), India: The Emerging Giant, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

5. Panagariya, A. (2013), Leave the Tendulkar Poverty Line Alone, The Times of India, 9 January.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3