Prostitution policy, morality and the precautionary principle

Author:

Hubbard Phil,Sanders Teela,Scoular Jane

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the contemporary regulation of sex work in England and Wales, placing this in the context of debates concerning morality, evidence and the efficacy of policy. Design/methodology/approach This brief paper is based on reflections on the authors’ research and their contribution to policy debates over the last two decades. Findings This paper presents prostitution policy as morality policy and suggests that it remains overwhelmingly based on the idea that prostitution is immoral and hence must be inherently harmful. Practical implications The paper makes a strong case for evidence-based policy in an area where morality tends to promote a partial and selective reading of evidence. Here, parallels are drawn with policies regulating other pleasurable but “sinful” activities, including the consumption of drugs and alcohol. Social implications It is argued that the dominance of a particular policy approach to sex work perpetuates stigma for those in the sex industries and exacerbates risks of harm. Originality/value By highlighting the moral dimensions of prostitution policy, the paper shows that the drift towards the criminalisation of sex work in England and Wales is not informed by academic evidence.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference39 articles.

1. The impact of decriminalisation on the number of sex workers in New Zealand;Journal of Social Policy,2009

2. Boff, A. (2012), “Silence on violence. Improving the safety of women”, report from the Lord Mayor of London’s Office, London.

3. Saving fallen women now? Critical perspectives on engagement and support orders and their policy of forced welfarism;Social Policy and Society,2015

4. Red light on sex work in Western Australia;Alternative Law Journal,2008

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3