Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the causal complexity of ECF investors’ peer effect through two different paths of structural social influence.Design/methodology/approachUsing the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach, we employ 157 samples from a Chinese ECF source to explore how peer-effect are caused by both informational and normative mechanisms.FindingsThe findings suggests that there are multiple configurations could lead to ECF investors’ high level peer-effect through both informational and normative mechanisms, and the informational mechanism' role depends on the normative mechanism, while the normative mechanism could lead to peer-effect independently.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings enrich the literature on ECF investors’ behaviors by revealing the diverse configurations resulting in investors’ peer-effect and shedding new light on investigating the decision-making driven by information asymmetry and relationship settings for individuals at a disadvantage.Originality/valueThis is the first study that investigates the multiple-driven of ECF investors’ decision-making and the importance of mutual norms in individuals' decision-making by complex network analysis approach and qualitative comparative analysis from the perspective of complexity. The results reveal the complexity of investors’ decision-making in ECF.
Reference86 articles.
1. Are syndicates the killer app of equity crowdfunding?;California Management Review,2016
2. Signaling in equity crowdfunding;Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,2015
3. Instrumental variables estimates of peer effects in social networks;Social Science Research,2015
4. Clean evidence on peer effects;Journal of Labor Economics,2006
5. Herding in equity crowdfunding,2018