Abstract
Purpose
– Short-term problem solving during production launch may result in extended lead times and increased overall costs of new product development, thereby reducing the overall profitability of a new product. While the previous literature suggests formalized procedures and systematic problem solving approaches, empirical analyses indicate improvised, non-systematic, and ad hoc responses actually being used in firms’ real world problem solving processes. The purpose of this paper is to explain the role of such non-systematic approaches for the efficiency and effectiveness of problem solving processes during production launch.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper empirically explores the impact of improvisational problem-solving behavior on a firm's production launch efficiency and on the success of new products. Moreover, the paper investigates the moderating role of technology familiarity, project complexity, and the number of occurring problems during production launch.
Findings
– The paper finds evidence for a positive curvilinear effect of improvisational problem-solving behavior on new product success and production launch efficiency. Additionally, the paper finds that improvisation is especially reasonable in complex and familiar projects or in the case of many unplanned changes during production launch.
Research limitations/implications
– The study provides evidence for the relevance of routinized and improvisational behavior during production launch.
Practical implications
– Improvisational behavior decreases the performance of the production launch and the financial performance of a new product in the case of frequent product changes or complex projects.
Originality/value
– For the first time behavioral theory is applied to the phenomenon of production launch and problem solving.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference116 articles.
1. Adner, R.
and
Levinthal, D.
(2001), “Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: implications for product and process innovation”, Management Science, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 611-628.
2. Almgren, H.
(2000), “Pilot production and manufacturing start-up: the case of Volvo S80”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 38 No. 17, pp. 4577-4588.
3. Amabile, T.
,
Conti, R.
,
Coon, H.
,
Lazenby, J.
and
Herron, M.
(1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1154-1184.
4. Anderson, E.W.
,
Fornell, C.
and
Lehmann, D.R.
(1994), “Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: findings from Sweden”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 3, pp. 53-66.
5. Armstrong, J.S.
and
Overton, T.S.
(1977), “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396-402.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献