Rediscovering EarthCube: Collaborate. Or collaborate not. There is no I

Author:

Smith II Plato,Malik Tanu,Berg-Cross Gary

Abstract

Purpose The EarthCube Technology and Architecture Committee working groups needed current information on the development of existing EarthCube-funded projects (e.g. building blocks, conceptual designs, and research coordination networks) to fulfill the goals of the working groups (e.g. gap analysis, use cases, standards bodies and testbed). The aims of this study include a compilation of planned outcomes, an assessment of current work and an investigation of interests in research collaboration among select EarthCube-funded projects. Design/methodology/approach Twenty-four principal investigators of 24 different EarthCube projects completed the Funded Projects Questionnaire composed of 35 questions in March and April 2015. Findings The survey response rate was 100 per cent and included a diversity of results ranging from planning stages to early development to final development. The funded projects in this study received awards in 2013 and 2014. Research limitations/implications The results are EarthCube-specific and are not generalizable. Suggestions for future research include integration of crosscutting disciplines and perspectives, best practices, guidelines and standards for broader impact. Practical implications This study identified potential collaboration opportunities, use cases and gaps (e.g. unmet architectural, functional, operational, organizational and/or technical needs). Social implications The impact on society include an improved understanding of the various EarthCube-funded projects and potential for collaboration within and across multiple disciplines. Originality/value This study contributed to the development of select outputs for EarthCube-funded projects’ presentations, Tech Hands Meeting, 2015 All Hands Meeting, select working groups’ outcomes and EarthCube Strategic Technology Plan and is of value to stakeholders, scientists and users.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,Information Systems

Reference16 articles.

1. Buddenbohm, S., Enke, H., Hofmann, M., Klar, J., Neuroth, H., and Schwiegelshohn, U. (2015), “Success criteria for the development and sustainable operation of virtual research environments”, D-Lib Magazine, September/October, Vol. 21 Nos 9/10, available at: http://dlib.org/dlib/september15/buddenbohm/09buddenbohm.html (accessed 3 November 2015).

2. Gil, Y., Arctur, D., Kelbert, A., Pearlman, J., Rubin, K. and Wood-Charlson, E.M. (2015), “Moving earth forward through science and technology collaboratories”, available at: http://earthcube.org/sites/default/files/doc-repository/Collaboratories-13May2015.pdf (accessed 5 November 2015).

3. Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research,2000

4. Science and cyberinfrastructure: the chicken and egg problem;Eos Trans. AGU,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3