Author:
Monobayeva Agipa,Howard Cosmo
Abstract
Purpose
– Since the collapse of the USSR, former Soviet republics have embarked on public service modernization, in most instances drawing on internationally dominant new public management (NPM) principles. Are post-Soviet republics ready for these administrative prescriptions? The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper discusses Kazakhstan’s experience with the implementation of NPM through a qualitative case study of the country’s adoption of the European Bologna higher education reforms.
Findings
– While implementation of the NPM-inspired Bologna program has produced significant achievements, there are also gaps and shortcomings. These are due to a remnant Soviet administrative practices including strong control by educational ministries, as well as incompatible organizational cultures and a tendency toward superficial formalism in the implementation process.
Research limitations/implications
– NPM tends to be introduced in a top-down fashion as a taken-for-granted component of state transformation, without sufficient attention to the capacities, cultures and systems required for effective and accountable performance-driven administrative reform.
Originality/value
– Kazakhstan’s experience provides crucial insights into the governance structures, professional cultures and managerial capacities required for successful implementation of NPM in post-Soviet states.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference73 articles.
1. Allen, R.
(1999), “New public management: pitfalls for Central and Eastern Europe”,
Public Management Forum
, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-15.
2. Altbach, Ph.
(2009), “Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution”, a report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education.
3. Amagoh, F.
and
Bhuiyan, S.
(2010), “Public sector reform in the Republic of Kazakhstan”,
Central Asia Business Journal
, Vol. 3, pp. 12-20.
4. Aucoin, P.
(1990), “Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums”,
Governance
, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 115-137.
5. Baltasiu, R.
(2012), “Is ‘Bologna’ the new ‘Guernica’ of education?”, Revista Inovatia Socială, numărul 1/2013.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献