Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential regional preferences of the diaspora and explain how such preferences affect their decision when engaging in reverse Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Since diasporas often act as conduits for trade and investment, the author is interested in whether these regional preferences affect their choice of destination for FDI.
Design/methodology/approach
– The author developed and pre-tested a questionnaire that was administered in pen and paper as well as online. Totally, 158 professional, managers and entrepreneurs with Indian diasporic background in the USA and Canada participated in the study. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 25 participants.
Findings
– Participants indicated that they did not favor their region of origin over the entire country. However, most of the participants only invested in their region of origin.
Research limitations/implications
– Interviews were based on the original survey questionnaire and did not further probe other issues. The current study should be treated as exploratory in nature and the results should be used as a springboard for future research.
Practical implications
– It would seem that the region of origin was important in the decision to migrate and for reverse FDI, even though cognitively the participants did not recognize it to the same extent. This might point to a mediation effect, which should be investigated in future studies. This paper helps businesses and governments understand the extent to which sub-national regional ties explain the investment motivations of people investing back in their home countries.
Social implications
– Furthermore, the importance of regional ties in the decisions to both invest and migrate point to the importance of studying sub-national cultural and institutional issues rather than treating large multicultural countries such as India as a monolithic bloc.
Originality/value
– The author used network ties theories to investigate and explain the investment behavior of Indian diaspora. While other disciplines (e.g. geography, sociology and economics) might have studied similar phenomena, the author looked and expanded the knowledge from a management perspective.
Reference67 articles.
1. Aharoni, Y.
(1966),
The Foreign Investment Decision Process
,
Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
2. Bal, G.
(2006), “Entrepreneurship among diasporic communities”,
Journal of Entrepreneurship
, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 181-203.
3. Ballard, R.
and
Ballard, C.
(1977), “The Sikhs: the development of South Asian settlement in Britain”, in
Watson, J.L.
(Ed.),
Between Two Cultures: Migrants and Minorities in Britain
, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 21-56.
4. Barney, J.
(1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”,
Journal of Management
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99-120.
5. Benet-Martínez, V.
and
Haritatos, J.
(2005), “Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): components and psychosocial antecedents”,
Journal of Personality
, Vol. 73 No. 4, pp. 1015-1050.