Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to test the impact of organizational justice on employees’ mental health. This paper is also an attempt to understand the moderating role of organizational identification on organizational justice and employee mental health.
Design/methodology/approach
– Standard questionnaires were used to collect data. A survey study was conducted in two multinational companies located in northern and southern part of India. The sample size of the study was 321.
Findings
– The result of hierarchical regression highlights that distributive and interactional justice were significantly correlated with employee mental health with positive interaction effect in the case of strong identification. Moderating effect of organizational identification on mental health and organizational justice was also found significant.
Research limitations/implications
– The theoretical development from this paper will contribute to organizational justice research presenting its impact on employee mental health. The moderating effect of organizational identification will bring a new dimension to understand the relationship of organizational justice and mental health.
Practical implications
– This study will provide insight to practicing manager to reinforce organizational justice practices at workplace. This will also help manager and leader to understand the identification level of employee with organization, and its impact on mental health.
Originality/value
– This paper explores all the three forms of organizational justice as antecedents. It also studied employee mental health as consequence and the role of organizational identification as moderator on justice and mental health.
Reference99 articles.
1. Adams, J.S.
(1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in
Berkowitz, L.
(Ed.),
Advances in Experiential Social Psychology
, Vol. 2, New York Academic Press, pp. 267-299.
2. Agarwal, U.A.
(2014), “Linking Justice, trust and innovative work behavior to work engagement”,
Personnel Review
, Vol 43 No. 1, pp. 41-73.
3. Aiken, L.S.
and
West, S.G.
(1991),
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
, Sage, New York, NY.
4. Albert, S.
,
Ashforth, B.E.
and
Dutton, J.E.
(2000), “Organizational identity and identification: charting new waters and building new bridges”,
Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 13-17.
5. Aquino, K.
(1995), “Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship”,
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
, Vol. 8, pp. 21-33.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献