Author:
Verma Neha,Rangnekar Santosh
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine applicability of the general decision-making style (GDMS) inventory in India, using a sample of managers. In addition the authors identify various decision-making styles (DMS) of Indian managers and explore their association with respondents’ gender, age, education, experience level, annual income, sector, industry and organizational output.
Design/methodology/approach
– The sample consisted responses of 500 Indian managers from public (13 percent) and private (87 percent) sector organizations. The data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis, independent sample t-tests and ANOVA.
Findings
– All decision-making sub scales (rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous) had satisfactory reliabilities and internal consistencies. Results obtained factor structure that confirmed the original five-factor structure of GDMS. There were also mutual correlations among the styles. Moreover, there were significant differences in the DMS across respondents’ profile variables.
Research limitations/implications
– This research is based upon survey method and voluntary participation. Hence one can question generalization of findings to larger samples.
Practical implications
– Results provide insights into DMS of the Indian managers. Organizations may use GDMS as a selection tool, respondents may hone their DMS.
Originality/value
– A majority of researchers use survey without evaluating validity of the instruments in the selected context and sample. This research contributed to the literature and practice by testing validation of the GDMS inventory in India.
Reference118 articles.
1. Agor, W.H.
(1984),
Intuitive Management
, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Albaum, G.
,
Herche, J.
,
Yu, J.
,
Evangelista, F.
,
Murphy, B.
and
Poon, P.
(2008), “Differences in marketing managers’ decision making styles within the Asia-Pacific region”,
Journal of Global Marketing
, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 63-78.
3. Allinson, C.W.
and
Hayes, J.
(1996), “The cognitive style index: a measure of intuition-analysis for organisational research”,
Journal of Management Studies
, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 119-135.
4. Allinson, C.W.
and
Hayes, J.
(2000), “Cross-national differences in cognitive style: implications for management”,
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 161-170.
5. Allinson, C.W.
and
Hayes, J.
(2012),
The Cognitive Style Index: Technical Manual and User Guide
, Pearson, Talent Lens.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献