What influences the use of seclusion? A cross-sectional study of forensic mental health nurses in a UK high secure hospital

Author:

Tulloch Lindsay,Walker Helen,Ion Robin

Abstract

Purpose Incidents of violence and aggression are a regular occurrence within adult forensic mental health inpatient settings and often lead to the use of restrictive practices such as seclusion. Such events are frequently attributed to the complexity of the patients. Research commonly focuses on patient’s characteristics and their association with seclusion use. Less attention has been centred on forensic mental health nurses’ attitudes to seclusion and the association of nursing staff characteristics. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey was undertaken using a standardised questionnaire, “Survey of Nurses’ Attitudes to Seclusion”. Responses were received from n = 147 nurses at a high secure forensic mental health hospital in the UK. Findings Key findings indicate that most participants believed seclusion should remain part of clinical practice. A correlation was identified between forensic mental health nurses’ attitudes to seclusion use and their characteristics: gender, age range, educational level and experience. Practical implications This paper presents novel information on seclusion reduction opportunities through modifiable workforce factors such as gender-sensitive rostering and staff training and development. Furthermore, recruitment and retention strategies should be prioritised so forensic mental health is perceived as an attractive career and a safe workplace. Originality/value The paucity of research in this area has prompted calls for further research to explore nursing staff characteristics and seclusion use. This is particularly important now due to the current global difficulty in the recruitment and retention of mental health nurses.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference66 articles.

1. Use of restraint and seclusion in psychiatric settings: a literature review;Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services,2019

2. Experience of coercion among nursing professionals in a medium‐stay mental health unit: a qualitative study in Spain;Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing,2023

3. Forensic psychiatric patients’ perspectives on their care: a narrative view;Perspectives in Psychiatric Care,2018

4. Promoting positive and safe care in forensic mental health inpatient settings: Evaluating critical factors that assist nurses to reduce the use of restrictive practices;International Journal of Mental Health Nursing,2019

5. Barr, L.A. (2023), “An explorative study into the use of restrictive practices in an adult forensic mental health inpatient setting”, [Curtin University], available at: www.hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/91141

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3