Exploration of “Talking Groups” within a medium secure setting

Author:

Tolland Heather,Laithwaite Heather

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore patient and staff views of a new intervention “Talking Groups” within a medium secure setting. Design/methodology/approach Seven patients and eight members of staff who had attended Talking Groups in the medium secure wards participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings The analysis revealed four key themes related to the aims, content and perceived benefits of Talking Groups: information; relationship building; engagement and patient involvement in developing activities/interventions. Practical implications If Talking Groups are extended to other wards in the medium secure unit, information sessions should continue as part of the groups, as these were valued by patients and provided useful information about transition, human rights and medication. Originality/value The findings suggest that Talking Groups have benefits for patients and staff within this medium secure setting. Findings from this evaluation can be used to inform the development of Talking Groups across different wards in this unit.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Looking beyond the illness: forensic service users’ perceptions of rehabilitation;Journal of Interpersonal Violence,2015

2. A qualitative study exploring the causes of boredom for men with a psychosis in a forensic setting;Occupational Therapy in Mental Health,2018

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

4. What does recovery mean to a forensic mental health patient? A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the qualitative literature;The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology,2016

5. Being in a secure forensic psychiatric unit: every day is the same, killing time or making the most of it;British Journal of Occupational Therapy,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3