Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to show new ways of overcoming resistance during organizational change by applying insights from New Institutional Economics.
Design/methodology/approach
– This is a conceptual paper that adapts findings from New Institutional Economics.
Findings
– The paper highlights the relevance of interactions between managers and employees for value creation processes: interactions can generate either win–win or lose–lose situations. By altering the restrictions on managers’ and employees’ behavior, change managers can create mutual benefits for the staff and the firm. The paper thus explicitly considers the individual interests of employees and managers and highlights an approach to link individual interests with the collective interests of the firm by means of appropriate interactions. Additionally, the paper elaborates the relevant factors that determine the success of classical change management measures, like communication or participation, to overcome resistance during organizational change.
Research limitations/implications
– The developed framework also indicates important conditions where approaches inspired by management, psychological and sociological theories can be successfully applied and where change management will benefit from being complemented by New Institutional Economics.
Practical implications
– Change managers can optimize inter-organizational competition or cooperation to generate a win–win situation by means of appropriate formal or informal restrictions (like incentives or binding mechanisms).
Originality/value
– This paper applies insights from New Institutional Economics to show how organizational change can be facilitated by producing mutual benefits. This paper postulates that organizational change often fails or, at the very least, meets with stiff resistance due to dysfunctional interactions within the company. However, such interactions actually contain great opportunities for change managers: by shifting the focus of these interactions, they can generate the potential for win–win situations. In this approach, mutual benefits are a decisive factor in increasing the acceptance to organizational change and overcoming resistance.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference76 articles.
1. Aghion, P.
and
Tirole, J.
(1997), “Formal and real authority in organizations”,
The Journal of Political Economy
, Vol. 105 No. 1, pp. 1-29.
2. Alchian, A.A.
and
Harold, D.
(1972), “Production, information costs, and economic organization”,
The American Economic Review
, Vol. 62 No. 5, pp. 777-795.
3. Arrow, K.J.
(1950), “A difficulty in the concept of social welfare”,
The Journal of Political Economy
, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 328-346.
4. Bainbridge, S.M.
(1998), “Privately ordered participatory management: an organizational failures analysis”,
Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 979-1076.
5. Barr, P.S.
,
Stimpert, J.L.
and
Anne, S.H.
(1992), “Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal”,
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 15-36.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献