Nursing under inconsistent organizational conditions

Author:

Visser Max,van der Heijden Beatrice I.J.M.

Abstract

Purpose – Health care organizations often experience difficulty in aligning competing and changing demands, tasks and other organizational conditions in a consistent way, so that they uniformly influence employee outcomes in desired directions. The purpose of this paper is to theorize about the ways in which inconsistent organizational conditions affect employee outcomes, the authors introduce the concept of double bind situation, and assess its impact on negative employee outcomes among nurses in Dutch health care organizations. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was held among 4,018 Dutch nurses as a part of the European NEXT study. Various psychometric scales served as “proxy” operationalizations of the characteristics of the double bind situation and employee outcomes. Findings – Three of the seven distinguished characteristics of the double bind situation showed the expected direction and strength of impact. Together, they accounted for 20 percent explained variance in employee outcomes. The results suggest that a double bind situation does exist for the nurses surveyed and that three of its seven characteristics have an impact on negative employee outcomes. Originality/value – This study is among the first to empirically assess the impact of the double bind situation in health care organizations. In this way, it contributes valuable knowledge to the development and retention of staff in a relevant public sector, characterized by high personnel turnover and profound organizational change.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference56 articles.

1. Abeles, G. (1976), “Researching the unresearchable: experimentation on the double bind”, in Sluzki, C.E. and Ransom, D.C. (Eds), Double Bind: The Foundation of the Communicational Approach to the Family , Grune & Stratton, New York, NY, pp. 113-149.

2. Argyris, C. (1977), “Double loop learning in organizations”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 115-125.

3. Argyris, C. (1988), “Crafting a theory of practice: the case of organizational paradoxes”, in Quinn, R.E. and Cameron, K.S. (Eds), Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management , Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 255-278.

4. Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind , Chandler, San Francisco, CA.

5. Bateson, M.C. (2005), “The double bind: pathology and creativity”, Cybernetics and Human Knowing , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 11-21.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3