Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine how much value national governments worldwide place on political, economic, scientific, artistic, religious, legal, sportive, health-related, educational and mass media-related issues. This knowledge is critical as governments and policies are typically expected to be congruent with the importance these issues have for society.
Design/methodology/approach
Drawing on theories of polyphonic and multifunctional organization, the authors recoded and analyzed a US Central Intelligence Agency directory to test the cabinet portfolio of a total of 201 national governments for significant biases to the above issues.
Findings
The results suggest that governments worldwide massively over-allocate their attention to economic issues.
Originality/value
The authors conclude that this strong pro-economic governance-bias likely translates into dysfunctional governance and development at both the national and supra-national level.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference91 articles.
1. Andersen, N.Å. (2003), “Polyphonic organizations”, in Hernes, T. and Bakken, T. (Eds), Autopoietic Organization Theory, CBS, Copenhagen, pp. 151-182.
2. Complexity and change: two ‘Semantic Tricks’ in the triumphant oscillating organization;Systemic Practice and Action Research,2000
3. Heterophony and the postponed organization organizing autopoietic systems;TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science,2007
4. How to improve the outcome of state welfare services. governance in a systems-theoretical perspective;Public Administration,2005
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献