The role of mental models in innovative teams

Author:

Davison Graydon,Blackman Deborah

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the role of mental models in knowledge development in order to demonstrate how the type and strength of the mental models held by a team contribute to its success in general and to innovation in particular.Design/methodology/approachTwo cases are analysed (a successful and an unsuccessful team) which were developed via observation and interviews. The mental models in each case were analysed to map them to the success or otherwise of the teams.FindingsThe first case demonstrates that mental models in a multidisciplinary team can provide opportunity for a shared generation of knowledge for process innovation while open to external influence. The second case demonstrates that, where there are strongly shared mental models that prevent the team from constructing an accurate picture of their present by closing out external influences and pre‐selecting desired knowledge, opportunities for innovation are shut down.Practical implicationsWhere mental models provide a sharing framework without closing out the networks and systems that sustain them, they can foster and support innovation. Managing team openness becomes a priority for supporting innovation. Team leaders will need to consider what types of mental models are developing and foster a focus on innovative outcomes and not processes. A concentration on understanding the current context via challenging given assumptions is recommended.Originality/valueThe paper offers clear, practical examples of the results of teams being encouraged to utilise open and closed systems of mental models.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference41 articles.

1. Barbato, M. (1999), “Palliative care in the 21st century – sink or swim”, Newsletter of the New South Wales Society of Palliative Medicine, May.

2. Blackman, D.A. (2001), “Does a learning organisation facilitate knowledge acquisition and transfer?”, Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory, Vol. 7 No. 2, available at: www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ Research/ejrot/Vol7_1/ Vol7_1articles/blackman.asp.

3. Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1979), The Management of Innovation, Tavistock Publications, London.

4. Caldwell, C., Bischoff, S.J. and Karri, R. (2002), “The four umpires: a paradigm for ethical leadership”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 36 Nos 1/2, pp. 153‐63.

5. Chanal, V. (2004), “Innovation management and organizational learning: a discursive approach”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 56‐64.

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pathways to survive in abrupt adversities: a configurational approach to understanding the resilience of new venture teams;Review of Managerial Science;2024-09-10

2. Examining the fluidity of innovation teams: a conceptual framework;Frontiers in Psychology;2023-12-18

3. Leader Thinking, Follower Thinking: Leader Impacts on Follower Creative Performance;Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior;2023-01-23

4. Leading for Innovation;2022-07-21

5. Inside the Black Box: Group Processes and the Role of Communication;The Emerald Handbook of Group and Team Communication Research;2021-11-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3