Author:
Dooley Lawrence,Kirk David
Abstract
PurposeThe paper aims to identify the requisite attributes and organisation to be displayed by a research university in order to engage successfully in collaborative research with industry partners.Design/methodology/approachThe conceptual framework contrasts the traditional public funding model against the requirements of the “triple helix” model of government‐university‐industry research funding. The framework supports the exploration of a case study of a long‐standing and successful joint research partnership, the Dundee‐Kinases Consortium, which links a world‐class life sciences research centre and a group of global pharmaceutical companies.Research limitations/implicationsThe case study provides a starting point, and additional case examinations will confirm the role of resource competences and organisational capabilities in facilitating performance by way of knowledge generation and transfer between partners.FindingsThe design and leadership of the consortium achieves vital performance outcomes, namely: accelerating the production of new knowledge about cell signalling processes relating to serious diseases; and faster transfer of new knowledge into drug development processes of pharmaceutical companies. The development of key enabling capabilities by the university, allied with routines for academic‐industry researcher interface, are essential elements of the partnering design.Originality/valueThe paper demonstrates that university‐industry partnerships build on government‐university funding, that university‐industry relationships foster new university capabilities, and moreover, that academic publication is not displaced by the requirements of industry partners.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference24 articles.
1. Betz, F. (1993), Strategic Technology Management, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
2. Brennan, L. (2003), “The view from the ivory tower: what do university alliances offer technology firms?”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 125‐7.
3. Bush, V. (1945), Science, The Endless Frontier, Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
4. Callon, M. (1998), “An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology”, in Callon, M. (Ed.), The Laws of the Market, London, Macmillan, pp. 244‐69.
5. Chiesa, V. and Piccaluga, A. (2000), “Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin‐off companies in Italy”, R&D Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 329‐39.
Cited by
134 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献