Author:
Shaw‐Ching Liu Ben,Madhavan Ravindranath,Sudharshan D.
Abstract
PurposeTo provide an explicit model to address the relationships between the structural characteristics of a network and the diffusion of innovations through it. Further, based on the above relationships, this research tries to provide a way to infer diffusion curve parameters (innovation coefficient and imitation coefficient) from network structure (e.g. centralization).Design/methodology/approachBased on the network and innovation literatures, we develop a model explicitly relating the structural properties of the network to its innovation and imitation potential, and in turn to the observed diffusion parameters (innovation and imitation coefficients). We first employ current theoretical and empirical results to develop postulates linking six key network properties to innovation and imitation outcomes, and then seek to model their effects in an integrative manner. We argue that the innovation and imitation potentials of a network may be increased by strategically re‐designing the underlying network structure. We validated the model by searching the published empirical literature for available published data on network properties and innovation and imitation coefficients.FindingsWe validated the model by searching the published empirical literature for available published data on network properties and innovation and imitation coefficients. The results reported from various relevant research papers support our model.Practical implicationsThis research shows that the innovation and imitation potentials of a network may be increased by strategically re‐designing the underlying network structure; hence, provide guidelines for new product managers to enhance the performance of innovative products by re‐design the underlying network structure.Originality/valueThe model developed in this paper is a breaking through result of synthesizing various traditions of diffusion research, ranging from anthropology and economics to marketing which were developed independently. The research explicitly modeled the diffusion process in terms of the underlying network structure of the relevant population allowing managers and researchers to directly link the diffusion parameters to the structural properties of the network. By doing so, it added value by making it possible to infer diffusion potential from directly measurable network properties. Vis‐à‐vis the network diffusion literature in particular, we added value by “unpacking” the diffusion process into innovation and imitation processes that form the building blocks of contagion. Moreover, we developed a holistic structural model of network diffusion which integrates the several network properties that have hitherto been studied separately.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference67 articles.
1. Abrahamson, E. and Rosenkopf, L. (1997), “Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: a computer simulation”, Organization Science, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 289‐309.
2. Ahuja, G. (1998), “Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study”, working paper series.
3. Bailey, N.T.J. (1975), The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its Applications, Charles Griffen, London.
4. Bass, F.M. (1969), “A new product growth model for consumer durables”, Management Science, Vol. 15, pp. 215‐27.
5. Becker, M.H. (1970), “Sociometric location and innovativeness: reformulation and extension of the diffusion model”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 35, pp. 267‐82.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献