Author:
Zhang Qingyu,Doll William J.
Abstract
While managers and researchers agree that the fuzzy front end of new product development (NPD) is critical for project success, the meaning of the term “front‐end fuzziness” remains vague. It is often used broadly to refer to both the exogenous causes and the internal consequences of fuzziness. This imprecise language makes it difficult for managers to separate cause and effect and thus identify specific prescriptive remedies for “fuzziness” problems. The vagueness of the concept and the lack of a framework for defining “front‐end fuzziness” also impede empirical research efforts. Building upon uncertainty theory, we define front‐end fuzziness in terms of environmental uncertainties. Front‐end fuzziness has consequences for a project’s team vision. It reduces the team’s sense of shared purpose and causes unclear project targets and priorities. Describes how foundation elements of a firm’s overall product development program can help project teams cope with front‐end fuzziness.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference50 articles.
1. Anderson, R.E. (1996), “Phased product development: friend or foe?” Business Horizons, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 30‐6.
2. Ansoff, H.I. and Stewart, J.M. (1967), “Strategies for a technology‐based business’’, Harvard Business Review, pp. 10‐22.
3. Bacon, G., Beckman, S., Mowery, D., and Wilson, E. (1994), “Managing product definition in high‐technology industries: a pilot study”, California Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 32‐56.
4. Balachandra, R. and Friar, J.H. (1997), “Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 276‐87.
5. Barczak, G. (1995), “New product strategy, structure, process, and performance in the telecommunications industry”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, pp. 224‐34.
Cited by
148 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献