Collaborative product development and situated knowledge contexts

Author:

Houman Andersen Poul,Balslev Munksgaard Kristin

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a framework for understanding how problem formulation, information search and division of work in new product development (NPD) activities is shaped by mind sets vested in organizations with diverging positions in the value chain and correspondingly situated knowledge contexts. The authors aim to focus on how this influences the marketability of new product ideas.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical data are derived from exploratory observation studies of NPD meetings and interviews of involved managers and specialists in three business dyads. The cases involve ingredient and meat suppliers, retail chains and marketing agencies located in Denmark.FindingsThe authors show that the scope and organization of NPD activities indeed are shaped by the combinations of situated knowledge contexts involved. An important intervening variable however concerns the atmosphere of the relationship, involving emotions and attitudes of the actors involved from foregone exchange situations.Practical implicationsFor managers of NPD activities, the relationship between the knowledge contexts involved, the concept development outcomes and the marketability of new product ideas are important factors to take into consideration in organizing supplier or buyer involvement in NPD.Originality/valueThe value of the paper is primarily related to its empirical contexts and the findings.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference50 articles.

1. Alderson, W. (1950), “The heterogeneous market and the organized behaviour system”, reprinted in Wooliscroft, B., Tamilia, R., Shapiro and S. (Eds.) (2006), A Twenty‐first Century Guide to Aldersonian Marketing Thought, Springer, Berlin.

2. Andersen, P.H. and Rask, M. (2003), “Global supply chain management – new organisational realities for procurement”, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 83‐95.

3. Brandenburger, A.M. and Nalebuff, B.J. (1997), Co‐optition, Double Day, New York, NY.

4. Carlile, P. (2002), “A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development”, Organization Science, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 442‐55.

5. Carson, D., Audrey, G., Chad, P. and Grönhaug, K. (2001), Qualitative Marketing Research, Chapter 9, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3