Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to propose the new typologies of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory.
Design/methodology/approach
This research conducted a thorough, targeted literature review along with a qualitative research method involving in-depth, open-ended and semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted with 21 managers and 70 employees of different public organizations during the two years. After interviews, data were transcribed and the qualitative research method of theory elaboration was used to extract the themes from the transcripts.
Findings
The results showed that the LMX has a dynamic nature with four different versions. Also, the results discovered the multi-level of LMX with three different types of leaders’ styles. In addition, four factors that cause damage to high-quality relationships have been identified (i.e. perceived dissimilarity, feeling of being betrayed, failure to meet the expectations and impression management). Finally, the results discovered five dark sides of LMX.
Originality/value
This research proposes the new typologies of LMX and the approach and findings of this research contribute to the literature of leadership theories.
Reference174 articles.
1. Authentic leadership and psychological ownership: investigation of interrelations;Leadership & Organization Development Journal,2014
2. Ashkanasy, N.M. (2003), “Emotions in organizations: a multilevel perspective”, in Dansereau, F. and Yammarino, F.J. (Eds), Research in Multilevel Issues, Vol. 2, Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp. 9-54.
3. Leader–member exchange and turnover before and after succession events;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2010
4. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior;Leadership Quarterly,1999
5. Masters of the long haul: pursuing long-term work goals;Journal of Organizational Behavior,2012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献