Cross-language information seeking behaviour English vs Arabic

Author:

Al-Wreikat Asma,Rafferty Pauline,Foster Allen

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the results and the methods of a study which applied grounded theory to the information-seeking behaviour of social scientists when searching Arabic and English academic databases using both languages. Design/methodology/approach – The research applied the grounded theory approach using search experiments and semi-structured interviews. Think-aloud protocol during the experiment was used to capture the data from the subjects to allow a detailed analysis for the experiment. The semi-structured interviews followed each experiment and were analysed using the Strauss and Corbin (1990) version of the grounded theory, as were the think-aloud protocols. Findings – The results of the think-aloud protocols and the semi-structured interviews suggest that the information needs of the subjects varied depending on the language used. In addition, it was discovered that social scientists followed more tactics in searching the Arabic database for the same tasks searched in English during the experiment. This allowed more search strategies and search tactics to appear in seeking information in Arabic language. The study also proposed a model to account for the cross-language information-seeking behaviour. Research limitations/implications – This study identifies and compares the information-seeking behaviour of the social scientists in Jordanian universities in searching both Arabic and English academic databases. Therefore, the findings of this study cannot be generalized to other Arab countries, unless there was similar context. Originality/value – Few studies have investigated information-seeking behaviour using academic Arabic databases and proposed information-seeking behaviour models. No studies have compared information-seeking behaviour when using Arabic and English academic databases. The value of the current study arises by being the first study to identify and compare the information-seeking behaviour of social scientists by using grounded theory and proposing a cross-language information-seeking behaviour model.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference47 articles.

1. Bates, M.J. (1989), “The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface”, Online Review , Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 407-424.

2. Belkin, N.J. , Oddy, R. and Brooks, H. (1982), “ASK for information retrieval”, Journal of Documentation , Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 61-71.

3. Bell, D.J. and Ruthven, I. (2004), “Searchers’ assessments of task complexity for web searching”, paper presented at 26th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR), Sunderland, pp. 57-71.

4. Bruce, H. (2005), “The pain hypothesis”, in Fisher, K.E. , Erdelez, S. and McKechnie, E.F. (Eds), Theories of Information Behavior , Information Today, Medford, NJ, pp. 270-274.

5. Bryman, A. (2008), Social Research Methods , 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3