Author:
Blažun Vošner Helena,Bobek Samo,Sternad Zabukovšek Simona,Kokol Peter
Abstract
Purpose
Research in the field of openness has become very broad and, unfortunately, also opaque. Thus, the purpose of this paper was to analyse and map the trends by applying bibliometric tools to the scientific literature published between 1990 and 2015, for descriptive bibliometric analysis, and 2011 to 2015, for content analysis.
Design/methodology/approach
A bibliometric analysis was used to identify document types, most prolific institutions, countries, source titles and Web of Science categories in the field of openness. Furthermore, bibliometric mapping was performed to discover country and institutional cooperation networks and to be able to understand funding opportunities for openness and information technology research. Additionally, with content analysis, scientific landscape was produced with most prolific terms and their chronological evolution through time.
Findings
The first information sources were published in 1990, and production was steady until 1998. After that period, the growth becomes exponential for the total number of information sources, as well as articles and proceedings papers, with a slight decrease in growth between 2009 and 2011. Descriptive bibliometric analysis showed that the most productive countries were the USA, the UK, Germany, China, Italy and Spain.
Originality/value
This paper presents the first holistic bibliometric analysis of the literature production concerning openness in relation to information and communication technology which helps researchers in the field to better understand the relations between themes and outsiders to get an overview of the openness scientific landscape.
Subject
Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference52 articles.
1. A bibliometric analysis of socio-economic research in NJESS,1959-1978;The Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies,1979
2. Archambault, É. and Gagné, É. (2004), “The use of bibliometrics in the social sciences and humanities”, available at: www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_2004_008_SSHRC_Bibliometrics_Social_Science.pdf (accessed 7 June 2016).
3. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration;Neuroimage,2011
4. Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation;Organization Science,2011
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献