Openness and information technology: a bibliometric analysis of literature production

Author:

Blažun Vošner Helena,Bobek Samo,Sternad Zabukovšek Simona,Kokol Peter

Abstract

Purpose Research in the field of openness has become very broad and, unfortunately, also opaque. Thus, the purpose of this paper was to analyse and map the trends by applying bibliometric tools to the scientific literature published between 1990 and 2015, for descriptive bibliometric analysis, and 2011 to 2015, for content analysis. Design/methodology/approach A bibliometric analysis was used to identify document types, most prolific institutions, countries, source titles and Web of Science categories in the field of openness. Furthermore, bibliometric mapping was performed to discover country and institutional cooperation networks and to be able to understand funding opportunities for openness and information technology research. Additionally, with content analysis, scientific landscape was produced with most prolific terms and their chronological evolution through time. Findings The first information sources were published in 1990, and production was steady until 1998. After that period, the growth becomes exponential for the total number of information sources, as well as articles and proceedings papers, with a slight decrease in growth between 2009 and 2011. Descriptive bibliometric analysis showed that the most productive countries were the USA, the UK, Germany, China, Italy and Spain. Originality/value This paper presents the first holistic bibliometric analysis of the literature production concerning openness in relation to information and communication technology which helps researchers in the field to better understand the relations between themes and outsiders to get an overview of the openness scientific landscape.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference52 articles.

1. A bibliometric analysis of socio-economic research in NJESS,1959-1978;The Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies,1979

2. Archambault, É. and Gagné, É. (2004), “The use of bibliometrics in the social sciences and humanities”, available at: www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_2004_008_SSHRC_Bibliometrics_Social_Science.pdf (accessed 7 June 2016).

3. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration;Neuroimage,2011

4. Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation;Organization Science,2011

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Ethical Behavior Is Considered in Different Contexts: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends;Administrative Sciences;2024-08-31

2. Trends and evolution of agile branding: a bibliometric analysis;Business: Theory and Practice;2024-07-31

3. Mapping the Research on Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship;International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation;2024-05-17

4. Topic prevalence and trends of Metaverse in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis;Data Science and Management;2023-12

5. Board of directors and business transformation: a bibliometric analysis;European Journal of Management and Business Economics;2023-05-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3