Author:
Lin Hsing-Er,Yu Andy,Choi Jeongho,Tsao Chiung-Wen,Stambaugh Jeff,Taylor Dina L.
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the effects of CEO gender on social enterprise (SE) value creation and the moderating effect of selective attention on SEs’ dual goals (i.e. relative attention to social versus economic goals).
Design/methodology/approach
The authors surveyed 596 active Taiwanese SEs to rate independent and moderating variables and received 191 responses (109 female and 82 male CEOs). The authors used external SE experts to evaluate each SE’s economic and social value creation, lowering the threat of common method bias and enhancing data quality.
Findings
Social value creation is higher with female chief executive officer (CEOs) (than with male CEOs), whereas economic value creation tends to be lower. But, attentional selection (i.e. changes in attention) to economic goals by female CEOs mitigates the negative relationship between female CEOs and economic value creation.
Practical implications
Gender diversity in the top management team is critical for dual-goal attainment. Decision-makers’ attention focus could vary along with the situation to achieve the desired outcomes. Thus, creating an attention structure under a given situation may help guide the decision-making process toward the desired performance for SEs.
Originality/value
Little research brings the attention-based view to investigate the effects of managerial gender roles on the dual-goal performance (i.e. social versus economic value creation) of SEs and test its contingency, and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to do so. This study also adopted a unique research design asking outside SE experts to provide the performance data.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Gender Studies
Reference68 articles.
1. Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter?;Management Science,2012
2. How social enterprises gain cognitive legitimacy in the post-pandemic period? Social welfare logic and digital transformation;Industrial Management and Data Systems,2021
3. Alter, K. (2007), “Social enterprises typology”, virtue Ventures LLC., available at: www.4lenses.org/setypology/prolog/ (accessed 20 October 2020).
4. An attention-based view on environmental management: the influence of entrepreneurial orientation, environmental sustainability orientation, and competitive intensity on green product innovation in Swedish small manufacturing firms;Organization and Environment,2022
5. From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises;Journal of Business Ethics,2016