Choice and control for older people using home care services: how far have council-managed personal budgets helped?

Author:

Rabiee Parvaneh,Glendinning Caroline

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the experiences of older people who use council-managed personal budgets (PBs) to fund home care services and their satisfaction with the level of choice and control they are able to exercise. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 18 older people from eight home care agencies across three councils in England. All interviews were semi-structured and face-to-face. Findings – Despite some optimism about improvements in choice and flexibility experienced by older people using home care services, the findings from this small study suggest that the gap between the “ideal” of user choice and the “reality” of practice continues to be significant. The level of choice and control older people felt able to exercise to tailor home care services to their personal needs and preferences was restricted to low level choices. Other choices were constrained by the low levels of older people's PBs and council restrictions on what PBs can be spent on. Older people's understanding of limitations in public funding/pressures on agencies and their reluctance to play an active consumer role including willingness to “exit” from unsatisfactory care arrangements appeared to further challenge the potential for achieving greater choice and control through council-managed PBs. Originality/value – The English government's policy emphasis on personalisation of care and support and new organisational arrangements for managed PBs aim to promote user choice and control. This is the first study to report the experiences of older people using managed PBs under these new arrangements. The paper highlights areas of interests and concerns that social care staff, support planners and commissioners may need to consider.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Care Planning,Community and Home Care,Gerontology

Reference39 articles.

1. ADASS (2010), “Personal Budgets: council commissioned services”, Advice Note (Putting People First).

2. ADASS (2011), Personal Budgets Survey March 2011 , Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, London.

3. ADASS (2012), ADASS Conference, National Children and Adult Services Conference 2012, Eastbourne, available at: www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/oct/26/councils-social-services-personal-budget

4. Allen, L. , Hogg, D. and Peace, S. (1992), Elderly People: Choice, Participation and Satisfaction , Policy Studies Institute, London.

5. Baldock, J. and Ungerson, C. (1994), Becoming Consumers of Community Care: Households within the Mixed Economy of Welfare , Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3