Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to describe teachers’ professional development in Lesson Study (LS) as processes situated in Semiosphere and generated by the unevenness due to different cultural traditions. The authors characterise teachers’ professional development in two LS experiments as processes generating new knowledge to point out their products, i.e. new professional frame teachers produce after these experiments. The authors use Hybridization, a particular form of Networking of Theories (NWT).Design/methodology/approachThe authors collected video-registration of several Italian LS meetings. The authors analyse two LSs, where time emerged as a conflictual aspect. Through Hybridization components, the authors show how teachers make sense of LS and how teachers revise their professional frame.Theoretical frameworkIn NWT different theories are deployed to study the same problem. To grasp the issue of unevenness in our LS, we use Hybridization of a Theory, a form of NWT characterised by a structural asymmetry. It is given when a construct c is introduced coherently, operatively and productively into a theory T, obtaining a hybridized theory T'.FindingsHybridization lens allows to describe potentialities and limits of LS as a tool for teachers’ development. The two analysed LS are different: in one of them Hybridization process produced a new theory T', whilst in the second one it was limited to the awareness of a gap between LS and initial teachers’ professional frame.Practical implicationsIdentifying links between different Hybridization components is a helpful tool for teacher educators/researchers to foster the shift from one another. For instance, through this tool, teacher educators could keep track of what happens in successive LS and mirror the dialogue between teachers, moving towards group-shared metareflections. This initiates the advancement of a new theory T', where asymmetries are interpreted.Originality/valueIn this approach teachers are protagonists of the construction of a new professional frame. LS is a tool for teachers’ professional development, allowing teachers to question their own educational intentionalities. Hybridization components provide a tool to analyse such a process.
Reference27 articles.
1. Andersson, A. and Norén, E. (2016), “Multilingual students' agency in mathematics classrooms”, in Halai, A. and Clarkson, P. (Eds), Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Multilingual Classrooms, Sense Publishers, pp. 109-124.
2. Arzarello, F. and Bartolini Bussi, M.G. (1998), “Italian trends in research in mathematical education: a national case study from an international perspective”, in Sierpinska, A. and Kilpatrick, J. (Eds), Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for Identity, Springer, pp. 243-262.
3. Barbin, E. and Menghini, M. (2014), “History of teaching geometry”, in Karp, A. and Schubring, G. (Eds), Handbook on the History of Mathematics Education, Springer, pp. 473-492.
4. Cultural issues in the communication of research on mathematics education;For the Learning of Mathematics,2013
5. Cultural transposition of Chinese lesson study to Italy. An exploratory study on fractions in a fourth-grade classroom;International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies,2017
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献