Alternative scholarly communication: management issues in a Ghanaian university

Author:

Asamoah‐Hassan Helena

Abstract

PurposeThis paper sets out to present what the KNUST Library has done to introduce alternative scholarly communication in the form of an institutional repository to the University.Design/methodology/approachThe study discusses management issues like agreement on policy to govern it, its acceptance by management and faculty as well as library personnel, and the software to be used that came into play along with challenges when the institutional repository was being planned and implemented.FindingsThe paper indicates that the introduction of the KNUSTSpace institutional repository has brought several benefits to the researchers in the University by offering them an alternative to the traditional means for scholarly communication and through that exposing their research to the world and the benefits that come with that. The University has also been show‐cased.Originality/valueThe paper clearly explains the key management issues encountered in the process of setting up the institutional repository and how they were tackled successfully. The paper will therefore be of assistance to libraries contemplating setting up institutional repositories.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference10 articles.

1. ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee (2009), Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers (accessed 11 November 2009).

2. Christian, G.E. (2008), “Issues and challenges to the development of open access institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria”, research paper prepared for IDRC, Ottawa, available at: https://idl‐bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/123456789/36986/1/127792.pdf (accessed 1 February 2010).

3. Kling, R., Spector, L. and Mckim, G. (2002), “The Guild Model”, The Journal of Electronic Publishing, Vol. 8 No. 1, August, available at: www.press.umich.edu/jep/08‐01/Kling.html.

4. Lynch, C.A. (2003), “Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL.226”, available at: www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html (accessed 16 November 2009).

5. Alternative Publishing Models – Scholarly Communication at Georgia State University (2009), Publishing Models – Scholarly Communication at Georgia State University, available at: www.library.gsu.edu/scholarlycomm/pages (accessed 16 November 2009).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3