Author:
Laitinen Markku,Saarti Jarmo
Abstract
PurposeQuality management, and its associated evidence‐based ideology, have influenced library management from at least the beginning of the 1990s. Both concepts emphasize that decisions have to be based on facts. Libraries have a long history of using statistics in data collection due to international agreements and standards. Although there is much data available in the libraries, perhaps this collected data have not been utilized as effectively as possible. This paper aims to discuss the possibilities of combining different types of statistical data in order to measure the efficiency of the work being done in libraries and what possible impact they can have in their parent organizations. It also aims to use the concept of data warehousing as a tool for joining different types of statistical data in the analysis.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a case study with statistical analysis of library data collected and a conceptual analysis of possibilities in the data warehousing of the library and library‐related data in order to improve its analysis.FindingsThe authors suggest that in order to improve the analysis of the library statistical data towards the actual effects the library has, for example, to the learning and research done within university, one must start to develop statistical data systems that enable the combination of different types of statistical data. This needs co‐operation between different vendors and government officials in defining the statistical data collected.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper is based on Finnish experiences and the data warehousing model should be tested empirically and developed further due to the challenges in the conformity of the data collected.Practical implicationsThe paper presents ideas and possibilities to evolve the library statistical data analysis.Social implicationsThe paper presents ideas for national and international bodies in how to develop statistical data systems and their interoperability.Originality/valueThe paper promotes the idea of combining library and other statistical data collected in order to provide better tools for library management.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference13 articles.
1. Ambrožič, M. (2003), “A few countries measure impact and outcomes – most would like to measure at least something”, Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 64‐78.
2. Barzelay, M. (2001), “The new public management: improving research and policy dialogue”, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, (Wildavsky Forum Series, 3).
3. Iivonen, M., Nygrén, U., Valtari, A. and Heikkilä, T. (2009), “Library collections contribute to doctoral studies: citation analysis of dissertations in the field of economics and administration”, Library Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 185‐203.
4. Kiviniemi, V., Laitinen, M. and Saarti, J. (2009), “Are libraries worth investing in?: Finnish university libraries and their effect on the national economy”, Liber Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 1, available at: http://liber.library.uu.nl/ (accessed 24 March 2011).
5. Kolderup Flaten, T. (2006), Management, Marketing and Promotion of Library Services. Based on Statistics, Analyses and Evaluation. Edit, Saur, Munchen, IFLA publication 120/121.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献