Monograph circulation over a 15‐year period in a liberal arts university

Author:

Cheung Sheila,Chung Terry,Nesta Frederick

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to determine what proportion of books were checked out in an academic library over a 15‐year period and what pattern of use occurs over the years and among various subject groups and between purchased and donated books.Design/methodology/approachCheck‐out counts were obtained for each year over a 15‐year period and the results analysed by year, language, and Library of Congress classification.FindingsBook check‐outs rise each year during the first five to seven years of a book's arrival in an academic library and stabilise after that period. Books that are checked out in their first year tend to continue to be checked out, while books that are not checked out in the first or second year will still not be checked out after 15 years. While overall check‐outs are generally about 70 per cent, some subject areas show almost 100 per cent use. As expected, books acquired as direct purchases had more use than books acquired as gifts. Although a third of the collection has not circulated over a 15‐year period, it is believed that the lack of use does not necessarily imply a lack of value.Originality/valueThis research covers a longer period than earlier studies and has been conducted in a non‐Western library using both Chinese and English texts. It supports the conclusion of earlier studies that approximately one‐third of book acquisitions will not be checked out and that circulation within the first few years of a book's acquisition is a good predictor of future circulation. For libraries considering remote storage, books not circulated within five to seven years could be removed to storage with little inconvenience to users.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference34 articles.

1. Bulick, S., Montgomery, K.L., Fetterman, J. and Kent, A. (1976), “Use of library materials in terms of age”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 175‐8.

2. Frase, R. (1961), “Book publishing”, Library Trends, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 249‐53.

3. Fussler, H.H. and Simon, J. (1969), Patterns in the Use of Books in Large Research Libraries, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

4. Hodowanec, G.V. (1983), “Literature obsolescence, dispersion, and collection development”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 421‐43.

5. Kent, A. et al. (1979), Use of Library Materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3