Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to comment upon the on-going debate about the preferred use of implicit models of valuation vs their explicit counterparts. The last few decades have seen changing complexities in UK leasing structures, and there is a suggestion that the implicit models are incapable of dealing with these complexities. This paper looks to address the issues and concerns with implicit models.
Design/methodology/approach
This education briefing is an overview of the pros and cons of both models and collates comments from industry to give an indication of the use of each model.
Findings
This paper analyses the appropriateness of implicit models of valuation and the areas in which they prove useful. Although the explicit models prove to be more useful in certain situations, the implicit models are also proved just as useful. The appropriate model needs to be used as appropriate to the property type.
Practical implications
Rather than seeing implicit and explicit models as “rivals”, they should be seen as two sides of the same coin. Both have advantages and disadvantages. The role of the valuer in practice is to choose the correct model for the valuation task in hand.
Originality/value
This is a review of existing models.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference9 articles.
1. The idea that valuation is an art, not a science, is hardly mentioned these days;Journal of Property Valuation and Investment,1998
2. The discounted cash flow method for property appraisals;Journal of Property Investment & Finance,2012
3. UK freehold reversionary properties: valuation practice revisited;Journal of European Real Estate Research,2013
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献