Are we promoting the health of people with physical mobility impairments? A literature review

Author:

Francis Donna Marie,Adams Ruth

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to examine whether the health education and health promotion literature is inclusive of people with physical mobility impairments. The English government Department of Health statistics indicate that the number of people living with physical mobility impairments is increasing and this is largely a result of chronic illness survival. The current UK Government has set targets to reduce inequalities that disproportionally affect those with disabilities. In light of the above points, it was expected that this interest would be reflected by a growing health promotion literature.Design/methodology/approachIn order to achieve an overview of health promotion offered for those with physical mobility impairments, a literature review was conducted. The literature was systematically reviewed using keywords and inclusion criteria. The range of published literature searched included research journals, health promotion texts, health and disability policy documents, as well as web sites offered on the internet.FindingsThere is a dearth in the information and development of health promotion for those with physical mobility impairments. Health policy documents offer little that is specifically focused for this group of people in particular. The majority of the relevant literature comes from the USA. Two theoretical positions are offered in the literature: one argues that those with physical impairments require a medical model approach to support individual's adjustment to society; and the other argues that emphasis should be placed on social change to accommodate those with physical impairments. While there are a range of initiatives in legislation and policy that utilise the social model position, the lack of UK health promotion interventions and the small number of US studies for improving the health of those with physical mobility impairments tends to encourage the medical model approach.Research limitations/implicationsThis review focuses particularly on health promotion for those with physical mobility impairments. Although not exhaustive, it highlights the need for further research into effective development of health promotion for those with physical mobility impairments in the UK.Practical implicationsFar more needs to be done to promote the health of those with physical mobility impairments. Both the medical model and social change approaches are required to deliver health promotion for this segment of the population.Originality/valueThere are no other reviews of the literature with a focus on physical mobility impairment and health promotion. This paper considers an often‐neglected group of people and identifies a need for effective health promotion information and resources.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Reference36 articles.

1. Barnes, C. (1998), “The social model of disability: a sociological phenomenon ignored by sociologists?”, in Shakespeare, T. (Ed.), The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives, Continuum, London, pp. 65‐78.

2. Beattie, A. (1991), “Knowledge and control in health promotion: a test case for social policy and social theory”, in Gabe, J., Calnan, M. and Bury, M. (Eds), The Sociology of the Health Service, Routledge, London, pp. 162‐202.

3. Brisenden, S. (1998), “Independent living and the medical model of disability”, in Shakespeare, T. (Ed.), The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives, Continuum, London, pp. 20‐7.

4. Bury, M. (2004), “Defining and researching disability: challenges and responses”, in Bury, M. and Gabe, J. (Eds), The Sociology of Health and Illness: A Reader, Routledge, London, pp. 266‐76.

5. Centre for Independent Living Kent (2009), “The guiding ethos of CILK”, available at: www.cilk.org.uk/ethos.htm (accessed 14 November 2009).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3