Author:
Paakkari Leena,Paakkari Olli
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to define health literacy as a learning outcome in schools, and to describe the learning conditions that are relevant for targeting health literacy.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on theoretical and empirical educational literature, and also the experiences of the authors.FindingsHealth literacy is defined as consisting of five core components: theoretical knowledge, practical knowledge, critical thinking, self‐awareness, and citizenship. The first three components are rather similar to the commonly‐accepted health literacy concept, but the definition given in this paper expands the concept via two additional – but essential – components. It is emphasized that when one is aiming to develop students' internal capacity to construct their own meanings regarding health topics, these two additional components are called for. The paper argues that one of the main aims of health teaching in schools should be to foster students' ability to define their own beliefs, identity and social relations. Moreover, if it is desired that students should become responsible citizens, acting in an ethically responsible way, competencies such as ethical reflection skills should be developed in schools. The paper also highlights the fact that the development of certain health literacy components calls for particular kinds of learning conditions.Originality/valueThe paper identifies the core components of health literacy as a learning outcome and gives practical examples of means to achieve a particular target.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference77 articles.
1. Abel, T. (2007), “Cultural capital in health promotion”, in McQueen, D.V. and Kickbusch, I. (Eds), Health and Modernity: The Role of Theory in Health Promotion, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 43‐73.
2. Abel, T. (2008), “Measuring health literacy: moving towards a health‐promotion perspective”, International Journal of Public Health, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 169‐70.
3. Barak, M., Ben‐Chaim, D. and Zoller, U. (2007), “Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher‐order thinking skills: a case of critical thinking”, Research in Science Education, Vol. 37, pp. 353‐69.
4. Barrow, W. (2010), “Dialogic, participation and the potential for philosophy for children”, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 5, pp. 61‐9.
5. Baxter Magolda, M.B. (1999), Creating Contexts for Learning and Self‐Authorship – Constructive‐Development Pedagogy, Vandervilt University Press, Nashville, TN.
Cited by
196 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献