Author:
Obradovikj Grncarovska Teodora,Dukovski Vladimir,Sharma Manu
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to formulate an integrated product policy (IPP) framework for the Republic of Macedonia, taking into account unique circumstances faced by the country, particularly the mandatory transposition of European Union (EU) environmental legislation, limited country-specific data availability and the low level of environmental awareness.
Design/methodology/approach
– The proposed IPP indicators at EU level and the available indicators in Macedonian conditions were used in order to create a composite IPP index as a method of measurement of the level of IPP implementation in the country. Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are used as a policy decision approach for IPP. The purpose is to evaluate what decisions (taken now and in the future) would lead to the best possible level of IPP implementation. The approach applicability for long-term policy planning is demonstrated using a simple numerical example.
Findings
– A stylized numerical example utilizing the composite IPP index and the MDP approach indicate that policy makers should focus not only on transposing the mandatory EU legislation related to IPP, but simultaneously work to raise public awareness of IPP and environmental issues, since this opens the door for more beneficial policy alternatives in the future. Considering the long-term consequences of actions taken in the present time should be an essential part of policy design, given the pervasive and long-term nature of the effects of IPP policy. It is also very important to revisit the assumptions at regular intervals and incorporate into this framework the new learning and data obtained with time.
Originality/value
– This IPP framework and quantitative policy decision approach, in spite of its limitations, is a valuable and informative guide for IPP policy makers in the Republic of Macedonia. By incorporating a long-term view, explicit measurement of progress towards IPP implementation and the consideration of possible future consequences of policy decisions made in the present, it should be possible to significantly increase the likelihood of successful IPP implementation and improve environmental outcomes than those obtained using more conventional approaches.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference27 articles.
1. Ammenberg, J.
and
Sundin, E.
(2005), “Products in environmental management systems: drivers, barriers and experiences”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 13, pp. 405-415.
2. Bahmed, L.
,
Boukhalfa, A.
and
Djebabra, M.
(2005), “Eco-conception in the industrial firms: methodological proposition”, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp 530-547.
3. Ernst and Young
(1998), “Integrated product policy”, study on behalf of DG Environment, London.
4. European Commission
(1996), Product Policy in Europe, New Environmental Perspectives, European Commission, Brussels.
5. European Commission
(2001), Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy, European Commission, Brussels.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献