The functional requirements for community information

Author:

Hider Philip

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the nature of community information (CI) and proposes a data model, based on the entity-relationship approach adopted in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), which may assist with the development of future metadata standards for CI systems. Design/methodology/approach – The two main data structure standards for CI, namely the element set developed by the Alliance of Information and Referral Systems (AIRS) and the MARC21 Format for CI, are compared by means of a mapping exercise, after which an entity-relationship data model is constructed, at a conceptual level, based on the definitions of CI found in the literature. Findings – The AIRS and MARC21 data structures converge to a fair degree, with MARC21 providing for additional detail in several areas. However, neither structure is systematically and unambiguously defined, suggesting the need for a data model. An entity-relationship data modelling approach, similar to that taken in FRBR, yielded a model that could be used as the basis for future standards development and research. It was found to effectively cover both the AIRS and MARC21 element sets. Originality/value – No explicit data model exists for CI, and there has been little discussion reported about what data elements are required to support CI seeking.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference32 articles.

1. Alliance of Information and Referral Systems (2013), “AIRS standards for professional information & referral and quality indicators”, available at: www.airs.org/files/public/AIRS_Standards_7_Final.pdf (accessed November 24, 2015).

2. Australian Library and Information Association (2011), “Beyond a quality service: strengthening the social fabric: standards and guidelines for Australian Public Libraries, Australian Library and Information Association, Canberra”, available at: www.alia.org.au/sites/default/files/documents/advocacy/PLSG_ALIA_2012.pdf

3. Baaske, J. and Zschernitz, R. (2006), “Going on ten: community information grows up”, Library Hi Tech , Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 227-233.

4. Bruns, P. (1992), “The USMARC community information format: a history and brief description”, Information Technology & Libraries , Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 387-392.

5. Bunch, A. (1982), Community Information Services: their Origin, Scope and Development , Clive Bingley, London.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3