Author:
Dubey Rameshwar,Gunasekaran Angappa,Altay Nezih,Childe Stephen J,Papadopoulos Thanos
Abstract
Purpose
– At a time when the number and seriousness of disasters seems to be increasing, humanitarian organizations find that besides their challenging work they are faced with problems caused by a high level of turnover of staff. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– Based on the 24 variables leading to employee turnover identified by Cotton and Tuttle (1986) the authors analyse the work-related, external and personal factors affecting employee turnover in humanitarian organizations, using a survey of members of the Indian National Institute of Disaster Management.
Findings
– Results indicated that the three factors are present. Of the external factors, only employment perception had a factor loading over 0.7; of the work-related factors, all were significant; of the personal factors, biographical information, marital status, number of dependants, aptitude and ability and intelligence had the highest loadings. It was also shown that behavioural intentions and net expectation were not significant.
Originality/value
– Only a few studies reported on employee turnover and its reasons are not well understood in the context of humanitarian organizations. To address this need, the aim of this paper is to explore the personal reasons impacting employee turnover in humanitarian organizations. In the study the authors have adopted 24 variables used in Cotton and Tuttle (1986) and classified into constructs to explain turnover, and further tested the model using data gathered from humanitarian organizations.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference35 articles.
1. Allen, D.G.
and
Griffeth, R.W.
(2000), “Job performance and turnover: a review and integrative multi-route model”,
Human Resource Management Review
, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 525-48.
2. Allen, D.G.
,
Bryant, P.C.
and
Vardaman, J.M.
(2010), “Retaining talent: replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies”,
The Academy of Management Perspectives
, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 48-64.
3. Altay, N.
(2008), “Issues in disaster relief logistics”, in
Gad-el-Hak, M.
(Ed.),
Large-Scale Disasters: Prediction, Control and Mitigation
, Cambridge University Press, pp. 120-46.
4. Armstrong, J.S.
and
Overton, T.S.
(1977), “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys”,
Journal of Marketing Research
, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396-402.
5. Chakravarty, A.K.
(2011), “A contingent plan for disaster response”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 134, pp. 3-15.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献