Author:
Schauer Alexander,Vasconcelos Ana Cristina,Sen Barbara
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to present a holistic framework, termed ShaRInK (Sharer, Relations, Institution, Knowledge), that depicts key categories of influences that shape individual perceptions of knowledge sharing within an organisational setting.
Design/methodology/approach
– An exploratory and qualitative case study strategy in which empirical data were gathered from 24 interviewees that were based in four different branches (i.e. China, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA) of a single information technology services organisation.
Findings
– The findings led to a holistic framework that depicts four key categories of influences that shape knowledge sharing from an individual perspective: attitudes and characteristics of the sharers, relations between the sharers, institutions which act as a united entity on sharer perceptions and knowledge itself. Furthermore, the four key influences not only shape knowledge sharing independently but are intertwined and have a synergistic effect. The ShaRInK framework is formed by combining these.
Originality/value
– The findings indicate that knowledge sharing from an individual-level perspective is a more complex phenomenon than currently portrayed in the literature. All four key influences, each being fundamentally different in nature, and their relationships should be taken into account. Equally, the ShaRInK framework can be applied by organisations when developing a knowledge-sharing strategy or auditing existing strategies.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management
Reference56 articles.
1. Alotaibi, H.
,
Crowder, R.
and
Wills, G.
(2014), “Investigating factors for e-knowledge sharing amongst academics staffs”, in
Granja, C.
and
Malzahn, D. (Eds)
, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management, IARIA, Red Hook, pp. 58-61.
2. Alvesson, M.
and
Kärreman, D.
(2001), “Odd couple: making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management”,
The Journal of Management Studies
, Vol. 38 No. 7, pp. 995-1018.
3. Beesley, L.G.A.
and
Cooper, C.
(2008), “Defining knowledge management (KM) activities: towards consensus”,
Journal of Knowledge Management
, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 48-62.
4. Bhaskar, R.
and
Zhang, Y.
(2007), “Knowledge sharing in law enforcement: a case study”,
Journal of Information Privacy & Security
, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 45-68.
5. Bi, X.-Q.
and
Yu, M.
(2010), “Notice of retraction – research on knowledge sharing mechanism within the organization based on the perspective of training”, in
Li, Y.
and
Desheng, W.
(Eds), 2010 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Management Science (ICAMS), IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 123-127.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献