Author:
Jensen Peter D. Ørberg,Petersen Bent
Abstract
Purpose
– While mainstream theories in international business and management are foundedeither explicitly or implicitly on studies of manufacturing firms, prior attempts to develop theoryon the internationalization of service firms are sparse and have yet to establish solid andcomprehensive frameworks. The thrust of this study is that value creation logics, a constructoriginally developed by Stabell and Fjeldstad (1998) can assist us in better understanding why and how service firms internationalize. The authors extend this construct and propose that the internationalization of service firms must be based on a thorough understanding of the fundamental nature of these firms.
Design/methodology/approach
– Theoretical study.
Findings
– The authors put forward propositions concerning the pace of internationalization and the default foreign operation modes in service firms.
Research limitations/implications
– The use of value creation logics can be a useful complement to the conventional approaches to the study of service firms’ internationalization. However, the fact that most firms encompass more than one value creation logic complicates the use of firm databases and industry statistics.
Practical implications
– The authors suggest that managers in service firms should consider primarily the nature of the value creation logic(s) in their firms when deciding and designing an internationalization strategy.
Originality/value
– The study presents a novel theoretical approach and a set of propositions on service firm internationalization founded on the specific characteristics of the service activities.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference95 articles.
1. Ahmed, Z.U.
,
Mohamad, O.
,
Tan, B.
and
Johnson, J.P.
(2002), “International risk perceptions and mode of entry: a case study of Malaysian multinational firms”,
Journal of Business Research
, Vol. 55 No. 10, pp. 805-813.
2. Akerlof, G.A.
(1970), “The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”,
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
, Vol. 84 No. 3, pp. 488-500.
3. Anderson, E.
and
Gatignon, H.
(1986), “Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions”,
Journal of International Business Studies
, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 1-26.
4. Anderson, J.C.
,
Narus, J.A.
and
van Rossum, W.
(2006), “Customer value propositions in business markets”,
Harvard Business Review
, March, pp. 90-99.
5. Argyris, C.
and
Schön, D.
(1978),
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献