Abstract
Purpose
This study attempts to answer why the predominant competitive reaction is non-reactive one in the previous literature by showing that some fluctuations of competitive reactions (CR) may average out to zero.
Design/methodology/approach
This research proposes a model for measuring competitive reaction volatility to examine whether a firm’s CR differs over time. A rolling-windows time series approach is applied to three different datasets.
Findings
The results show that firms indeed react to each other, but the types of reactions vary over time, thereby creating a misunderstood “no-reaction” in the literature.
Practical implications
This study may help understand the gap between academic findings (i.e., no-reaction) and managerial reality (i.e., marketing wars).
Originality/value
Although a firm’s CR should be understood as a series of managerial actions that may change over time, the extant literature has not considered this temporal variation of CR. This paper provides a systematic review of the empirically based literature and provides insights into the importance of strategic variation in competitive dynamics.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference53 articles.
1. Akhavan, P. , Ebrahim Sanjaghi, M. , Rezaeenour, J. and Ojaghi, H. (2014), “Examining the relationships between organizational culture, knowledge management and environmental responsiveness capability”,The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 228-248.
2. Strategic assets and organizational rent
3. Bloodgood, J. (2014), “Enhancing the resource-based view of the firm: increasing the role of awareness”,Strategic Management Review, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 61-75.
4. The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship
5. Do managers ovȩrreact to each others' promotional activity? Further empirical evidence
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献