Abstract
PurposeAlthough investigating the factors influencing technological diversification is essential to understanding research and development (R&D) strategies, studies from the perspective of corporate ownership structure are limited. This study examines the effect of heterogeneous institutional investors on technological diversification strategies.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consists of 33,124 firm-year observations of USA manufacturing firms from 1981 to 2008. Data were extracted from US Patent Data, Thomson Reuters' 13f and the Compustat database. A panel regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis. Moreover, the two-stage least squares (2SLS) approach using instrumental variables (IVs) and generalized method of moments (GMM) were also applied to address the endogeneity issue.FindingsThe empirical findings indicate that short-term (long-term) institutional investors positively (negatively) affect technological diversification. That is, short-term institutional ownership hampers R&D diversification, suggesting that firms are forced to make myopic investments to meet short-term goals instead of diversifying corporate R&D projects. Meanwhile, long-term institutional ownership enhances technological diversification to achieve long-term value.Research limitations/implicationsBy differentiating between institutional investment horizons, the authors produce empirical evidence that institutional investors with short-term and long-term perspectives have different views on technological diversification. This study is based on data between 1981 and 2008, due primarily to patent data availability and data on institutional investors. However, this limitation does not diminish the importance of the empirical findings, as the study's focus is on discovering antecedent evidence of corporate technological diversification rather than addressing recent trends in firm decisions.Practical implicationsIn finding that long-term institutional investors are likely to encourage technological diversification at firms, the paper carries an important practical implication that can help inform decision-making by policymakers and investors.Originality/valueThis research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of institutional investors' role in technological diversification strategies. Additionally, by challenging the assumption that all institutional owners share the same perspective, this study is the first to confirm the existence of heterogeneous effects of institutional investors on technological diversification strategies.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference98 articles.
1. Corporate governance and performance of small high-tech firms in Sweden;Technovation,2006
2. Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (1991), “R&D, firm size, and innovative activity”, in Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (Eds), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 39-59.
3. Innovation and institutional ownership;American Economic Review,2013
4. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations;The Review of Economic Studies,1991
5. Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization;Strategic Management Journal,1996
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献