Author:
Craig Russell,Amernic Joel
Abstract
PurposeThis paper is the third in a trilogy of papers to explore the use of accounting as a fundamental element in senior management's narrative regarding the privatization of a major transportation enterprise, Canadian National Railway (CN). The paper aims to examine how two accounting performance benchmarks (the operating ratio, and free cash flow) were deployed to help sustain a rhetoric of post‐privatization success. The aptness (and the danger) of accounting language in strategic narrative is highlighted.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes the importance of senior management discourse in the aftermath of a privatization. A narrative perspective is adopted, in which an imagined future post‐privatization era initially articulated in accounting language is then told and re‐told as the post‐privatization years unfold. Accounting performance measures highlighted in the story of success of the privatization in the Annual Letters to Shareholders by the CEOs of CN in the ten years following privatization in 1995, and celebrated in the Annual Report, are examined critically.FindingsThe results emphasize the important features and role of accounting language and accounting‐based performance benchmark measures in the narrative construction of the success of a privatization by corporate leaders.Research limitations/implicationsCase studies possess the strength of specific instance detail and interpretation, and the ostensible weakness of interpretation of a sample of one. But such research can provide for a reframing of conceptual perspectives and stimulate additional efforts to interrogate the role of accounting language in events of major social change.Practical implicationsThe paper strongly endorses the adoption of a critical analytical perspective by those affected by a major social change (such as a privatization) in which the role of accounting language is subtle, but nonetheless persuasive and enduring.Originality/valueThe paper examines a case study in which the narrative framing of success is made rhetorically potent by deploying accounting performance measures. The paper reinforces the view that accounting is not an innocent bystander in the political and narrative manoeuvrings associated with a privatization. Accounting does not axiomatically provide an objective measure of some underlying financial truth, but is part of an arsenal of rhetoric to achieve political ends.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Alvesson, M. and Karreman, D. (2000), “Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis”, Human Relations., Vol. 53, pp. 1125‐49.
2. Amernic, J. and Craig, R. (2000), “Accountability and rhetoric during a crisis: Walt Disney's 1940 letter to stockholders”, The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 49‐86.
3. Amernic, J. and Craig, R. (2004), “Reform of accounting education in the post‐Enron era: moving accounting ‘out of the shadows’”, Abacus, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 342‐78.
4. Amernic, J. and Craig, R. (2006), “CEO‐Speak”, The Language of Corporate Leadership, McGill‐Queens University Press, Montreal and Kingston.
5. Barry, D. and Elmes, M. (1997), “Strategy retold: toward a narrative view of strategic discourse”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 429‐52.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献