Author:
Murray Alan,Sinclair Donald,Power David,Gray Rob
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to explore whether there is any relationship(s) between social and environmental disclosure and the financial market performance of the UK's largest companies.Design/methodology/approachTwo data sets were used in the study. The CSEAR database of UK companies provided the social and environmental disclosure component. The second data were the stock market returns earned by the largest UK companies as listed by The Times 1,000. A series of statistical tests was performed to examine whether any relationship could be detected in either the cross sectional or longitudinal data over a period of ten years.FindingsNo direct relationship between share returns and disclosure was found. Neither had such a relationship been expected, in keeping with the prior literature. However, the longitudinal data revealed a convincing relationship between consistently high(low) returns and the predilection to high(low) disclosure. There is no single convincing theoretical explanation as to why this might be.Originality/valueThis paper demonstrates the importance of examining a range of hypotheses on longitudinal data when other research suggests that any relationships are unlikely to be unstable year on year. More significantly, this paper is motivated not by a concern to understand better how investors' already‐high returns may be bettered, but rather to explore how the alleged potential of financial markets to contribute to social responsibility and sustainability might be engaged.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference93 articles.
1. Anderson, J. and Frankle, A. (1980), “Voluntary social reporting: an iso‐beta portfolio analysis”, The Accounting Review, July, pp. 467‐79.
2. Arnold, P. and Hammond, T. (1994), “The role of accounting in ideological conflict – lessons from the South African divestment movement”, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 11‐126.
3. Arnold, P.J. (1990), “The state and political theory in corporate social disclosure research: a response to Guthrie and Parker”, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 177‐81.
4. Bailey, D., Harte, G. and Sugden, R. (1994a), Making Transnationals Accountable: A Significant Step for Britain, Routledge, London.
5. Bailey, D., Harte, G. and Sugden, R. (1994b), Transnationals and Governments: Recent Policies in Japan, France, Germany, the United States and Britain, Routledge, London.
Cited by
258 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献