Financial accounting reforms in the Australian public sector

Author:

Potter Brad

Abstract

In recent years in Australia, accounting regulations have been developed that require the adoption of commercial accounting and reporting practices by public‐sector organisations, including the recognition of cultural, heritage and scientific collections as assets by non‐profit cultural organisations. The regulations inappropriately apply traditional accounting concepts of accountability and performance, notwithstanding that the primary objectives of many of the organisations affected are not financial. This study examines how this was able to occur within the ideas outlined in Douglas’s (1986) How Institutions Think. The study provides evidence to demonstrate that the development; promotion, and defense of the detailed accounting regulations were each constrained by institutional thinking and, as a result, only certain questions were asked and many problems and issues associated with the regulations were not addressed. Thus, it seeks to further our understanding of the nature and limits of change in accounting and the role of institutions in promoting and defending changes to accounting practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting

Reference95 articles.

1. Abbott, A. (1988), The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

2. Adler, E. and Haas, P.M. (1992), “Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order and the creation of a reflective research program’’, International Organization, Vol. 46 No. 1, Winter, pp. 367‐90.

3. Aiken, M. and Captanio, C. (1995), “Accrual accounting valuations and accountability: a potentially pernicious union”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 54 No. 4, December, pp. 564‐75.

4. Aiken, M. and McCrae, M. (1992), ‘‘Full cost pricing and public sector reporting: alleviating undisclosed short‐run measurement biases of ‘user to pay’ policies”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, Spring, pp. 13‐34.

5. Aiken, M. and McCrae, M. (1996), “The commercialization of government’s departmental accounting (AAS 29): quasi rents and public welfare”, Abacus, Vol. 32 No. 2, September,pp. 196‐213.

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3