Author:
Carnegie Garry D.,Napier Christopher J.
Abstract
Accounting historians have long recognised accounting’s international scope but have typically concentrated their research endeavours on region‐ or country‐specific studies, or on investigating the diffusion of accounting ideas, techniques and institutions from one country to others. Much potential exists to study the development of accounting from a comparative international perspective, mirroring the attention paid over the past two decades to the comparative study of international accounting practices and standards. This paper proposes a definition of comparative international accounting history (CIAH) and examines the nature and scope of studies within this genre. The CIAH approach is exemplified through an exploratory comparative study of agrarian accounting in Britain and Australia in the latter half of the nineteenth century. In the light of this study, the paper evaluates the potential of CIAH to contribute to an understanding of accounting’s past and provide insights into accounting’s present and future.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference103 articles.
1. Adler, E. and Haas, P.M. (1992), “Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program”, International Organization, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 367‐90.
2. Adler, N.J. (1983), “A typology of management studies involving culture”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 14, pp. 29‐47.
3. Ansari, S.L. and Bell, J. (1991), “Symbolism, collectivism and rationality of organisational control”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 4‐27.
4. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1998), Self‐Generating and Regenerating Assets, AAS35, AARF, Caulfield.
5. Bateman, J. (1883), The Great Landowners of Great Britain and Ireland, 4th ed., Harrison, London.
Cited by
147 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献