Author:
Tayles Mike,Pike Richard H.,Sofian Saudah
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of the paper was to examine whether, and in what way, managers perceive that the level and shape of intellectual capital (IC) within firms influences management accounting practice, specifically, performance measurement, planning and control, capital budgeting, and risk management. It also explores whether such firms are better able to respond to unanticipated economic and market changes and achieve relatively higher performance within their sector.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on the results of a study conducted in Malaysia through a questionnaire survey in 119 large companies with varying levels of IC and selected interviews with both accounting and non‐accounting executives in a subset of them.FindingsThe findings in the paper suggest some evolution in management accounting practices for firms investing heavily in IC. The findings are discussed and further explored through interviews in some of the firms analysed.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitations of survey research in this paper are acknowledged, however these are ameliorated by confirmatory insights from the interviews. Further research could be carried out using more extensive case studies in companies, perhaps longitudinally, or undertaken using sector focused surveys.Practical implicationsIt is important to show in the paper that management accounting systems reflect the strategic orientation of the companies concerned. Where a greater focus on intangibles and intellectual capital occurs it may require a different emphasis on management accounting practices compared to companies where they do not feature strongly. It is important that management recognise and act on this in order to improve corporate performance.Originality/valueThe paper shows that it is widely recognised that (IC), whether in the form of knowledge, experience, professional skill, good relationships, or technological capacity is a major source of corporate competitive advantage. Whilst the literature places considerable attention on the valuation, measurement and reporting of IC for external reporting purposes, far less attention has so far been given to the implications of IC for managerial accounting practice. This paper addresses this omission.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference107 articles.
1. Abdel‐Khalid, A.R. (2003), “Self‐sorting, incentive compensation and human capital assets”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 661‐97.
2. Abeysekera, I. and Guthrie, J. (2004), “Human capital reporting in a developing nation”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 251‐68.
3. Aharoni, Y. (1966), The Foreign Investment Decisions Process, Harvard Graduate Business School, Boston, MA.
4. Amir, E. and Lev, B. (1996), “Value relevance of non‐financial information: the wireless communications industry”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 22 Nos 1‐3, pp. 3‐30.
5. Amir, E., Lev, B. and Sougiannis, T. (2003), “Do financial analysts get intangibles?”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 635‐59.
Cited by
130 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献